Chelsea Archives - annarborappraisal

Belser Estates and Chelsea Ridge

Description
Belser Estates and Chelsea Ridge are connected to each other through common streets, and tend to function as one neighborhood. The neighborhood is made up of two phases of Belser, plus Chelsea Ridge site condominiums. Belser Estates had 28 sites in the first phase and 46 sites in the second phase. Cook Builders developed Chelsea Ridge to the immediate east which contains an additional 60 sites. There may be additional land to the east but not part of this brief neighborhood description.

The oldest houses I found in the Belser Estates was from 1989, and newest in 1997. The newer houses in the of Chelsea Ridge began around 2002 up through 2005. One newer house in Belser was noted, built in 2015. The housing is a mixture of single-story ranches, colonial style, some contemporary properties and a couple Cape Cods. Chelsea Ridge mainly has colonial style around 2,000-2,500 sqft but with variety.

The northern boundary of the neighborhood is Dexter-Chelsea Road and the Railroad tracks adjacent to it. The railway is active and includes both Amtrak passenger trains, as well as freight trains. The southern boundary is a field south of Darwin, and Meadowview Dr just south of that. To the west is Freer Road, and to the east is undeveloped land which appears to have been slated for an expansion of Chelsea Ridge based on street extensions. This neighborhood is on the far east side of the city of Chelsea, within city limits, and serviced by the municipal water and sewer lines. Schools are proximate with the middle school around a half mile west, and high school about 0.75 miles south. The downtown corridor is less than a one-mile walk.

Changes over time
So, what has happened in this local market over the years? I took information from the Ann Arbor Area Board of Realtors MLS through a map search and laid out the adjusted sales price and adjusted sales price per square foot since 2005. The data is presented in two graphs below. Both show a dip in prices from 2005 through 2010-2012, and then increases since that time. Overall, both are showing higher today than prices from 2005. The earlier top of the market seems to be 2006 related to price per square foot and 2005 on sales price. This does follow what most area agents and appraisers have tracked, that of the market starting a decline in late 2005 locally, although it appears slightly later in this neighborhood based on these sales.

Only MLS sales were tracked as I do not have the ability to pull information on for sale by owner data onto the spreadsheet. Normally most sales do go through the MLS. The most recent sales closed in August and September 2018, at $334,900 and $325,000. Two houses are on the market within the development, both under contract, both have asking prices above that of the recent sales at $349,000 and $349,900. We have to wait and see what they sell for. The fact that houses are under contract with higher asking prices than the recent sales can again indicate an increasing market.

There are indications that our local market is quite active again, including the number of properties under contract in addition to any changes in price (there were two sets of properties in Chelsea Ridge that sold and resold between 2017 and 2018 which indicate an increasing trend in that period but do not necessarily equate to today). Open house activity can give a great view of how active the market is, as do absorption rates. Lack of inventory can cause overbidding when there is simply not enough supply to meet demand. Every market segment can be different, and one market within the same community may have adequate supply and not be experiencing overbidding, while others may exhibit a shortage. With only five MLS sales in Belser and Chelsea Ridge in 2018, it is not showing as a very active market, but with both listings under contract, there is no supply either.

When in need of valuation services, consider contacting your local appraisal expert. Appraisers provide unbiased, independent, and competent researched opinions.

Affordability in Chelsea Fairways

Affordability and rising prices

We have seen rapid price appreciation from recent market lows in 2007-10 in this particular submarket. Rising prices are great for sellers, but are they good for buyers? How do the increasing prices affect affordability?

Chelsea Fairways is a newer subdivision on the southeast side of Chelsea in Michigan. It has had a handful of developers active over the years, with the initial sales starting in 2002 and stalled around 2006 when the market slowed down locally. The final build out was completed in 2016 by a different builder, but throughout, the housing stock remained similar in quality and scope. Arraying the sales by price less concessions, it is easy to see how the bottom of this market was towards the 2008-10 period, with rapid increases from 2014 through 2017.

Other than completing the build-out of the development, not much has changed in the subdivision. The houses remain similar, the housing stock has aged somewhat, but the area is well maintained and continues to be a popular subdivision.

How do the increases in price affect affordability? We hear arguments about how the low interest rates made payments much lower, allowing buyers to stretch their housing dollars, but interest rates have been increasing slightly over the years based on the data found through Freddie Mac (see link below) which references historic interest rates by month.

One sale sold and resold a few times during this period, and is a good indicator about how payments would change over time with the hypothetical same buyer, with 20% down payment and prevailing interest rate for the time. In June 2012 the house sold for $226,200 and had taxes equivalent to $427 per month. Interest rates showed as 3.68% at that time. In May 2017 it sold for $335,000 and taxes of $493 per month. Interest rates showed at 4.01%. In July 2018 it sold for $359,000 and had taxes of $480 per month. Interest rates showed at 4.53%.

Based on the old rule of 28% housing-debt to income ratio, the following tables shows how the increasing interest rates and mortgage payment, increases the amount of income necessary to afford the same house. Although the 28% rule no longer applies, it is relevant in gauging changes in affordability. The same house purchased today would have an increase of almost $500 per month compared to six years ago. Does the typical buyer have the additional $500 per month to spend on mortgage payments, and would it affect the amount they could set aside for eventual needed repairs on the house? The increase in the properties sales price in six years was 58.71%. The rise in property payments over the same period was 54.25%. Have incomes increased over 50% in six years?

Of course, this example may be extreme, but since the sale was recent, and it sold several times over the past six years, it was germane. Interest rates rose, taxes declined slightly from the 2017 to 2018 period, making the payment a bit less than would otherwise be expected. In 2012, most of the houses sold were in the mid $200,000’s. There were a few REO sales that brought median and average lower, but the five non-distress sales had an average price of $236,274, therefore the sale used as a test was in the range of the others. In 2018 there were five sales with an average price of $372,300, also indicating an increase of over 57% in that same period.

Is this type of increase, coupled with the increasing interest rates and increasing taxes (for the most part) partly responsible for the current slowdown we are seeing? Is it just that we are entering a traditionally slower time of year? I do not have a crystal ball for the future, but throw out the question about affordability, since most people I know did not have a 50% increase in income over the past six years that would be what is needed to afford the same house.

Historic interest rates found through the following website:

http://www.freddiemac.com/pmms/pmms30.html

September Washtenaw County Snapshot

Snapshot of the market for 9/1/18

pexels-photo-164359

How are we faring in Washtenaw County as far as market absorption?

A quick run of the Ann Arbor Area Board of Realtors MLS data for single family properties (includes duplicate listings due to multiple board insertions) shows mixed trends. To read the chart below, the data is arrayed by area, the number of prior closed sales in the last year, supply based on these sales (only includes available properties), total number of listings, those that are reporting as available, those under contract, and the contract to listing ratio.

9.1.18 snapshot

I have found the contract-to-listing ratio (CTLR) the most meaningful in measuring how a market is faring, and consider anything under 20% to be a buyers’ market, between 21-34% balanced, and over 35% as a sellers’ market. Based on this information three markets are showing as sellers’ markets, those being Lincoln, Milan and Ypsilanti. Ann Arbor and Chelsea are tilting towards a sellers’ market, and Manchester, Dexter and Saline are showing balance.

Based on the total number of sales in the past year, compared to what is currently available, Lincoln, Milan and Ypsilanti again are all showing less than two months of inventory, which helps support the thesis of a sellers’ market in these areas. Ann Arbor has less than three months inventory, while Chelsea, Manchester and Dexter are showing around 3.5 months in general. Saline shows close to five months’ worth of inventory, but my suspicion is that much of this relates to a larger number of “to be built” offerings in Saline as there are a number of new subdivisions under construction that are inputting offerings into the MLS. This may be the case as well in Ann Arbor and Chelsea, where new subdivisions are underway.

As we head into the fall, and new school year, the markets tend to slow down, and there is evidence based on this larger data, that this is the case with some areas. Of course, this information is “macro” data in that it includes each entire school district as opposed to the sub-markets within each one. I plan on running this type of information monthly for this blog, so we can compare how markets track over time. Please feel free to share the information gathered, and if you want to subscribe to my email distribution list, let me know, or sign up to follow my blog at https://annarborappraisal.blog//. I am always available to chat or assist with your appraisal needs.

January 25, 2014 Washtenaw County market snapshot

January 25, 2014 Washtenaw County snapshot

On January 11, 2014 I posted a snapshot of the Washtenaw County market showing the number of arm’s length sales in each school district as well as the change in price per square foot over time and the current number of offerings and houses under contract.

After some consideration, I have eliminated all “to-be-built” houses as they are starting to flood into the market locally. These houses are not truly on the market as they are not yet started and are not available for immediate, or even generally quick, occupancy.

The data below is a snapshot of the supply and demand factors for the various Washtenaw County markets as of 1/25/14 through the Ann Arbor Area Board of Realtors MLS. Instead of showing price trends in this snippet, this data shows the number of arm’s length sales of houses that are already built, or under construction, compared to how many are on the market at this time that are NOT showing as under contract.

The number of sales relates to one year prior to 1/25/14 and the number of active listings are the number that were available and not under contract on that day.
The number of months’ supply relates to, given the number of historic sales, how quickly the current inventory “should” absorb.
The contract-to-listing ratio relates to how many of the current listings are under contract and to me, that number is most telling of current activity. Historically I find that between 25% – 30% is a typical active market and that less than 20% is generally slow, favoring buyers. Over 35% we start to see a seller’s market.

Without further ado, here are the results:

Based on this information, Ann Arbor still is in seller’s market territory, as is Lincoln and now Milan (when I did this last, Milan was showing over-supplied but that relates to a large number of “to-be-built” houses). Saline, Dexter, Chelsea, Ypsilanti, Willow Run and Whitmore Lake seem to be in a more normal market, and Manchester is slow with the greatest supply compared to historic demand. In most cases, inventory is in the 2-month range, which is an under-supply. Ann Arbor is particularly undersupplied.

Not all houses that are on the market are appropriately priced, and if a house is over-priced for the market (due to condition or functional/external issues, or just too optimistic pricing); these houses show as part of the supply chain but are not yet truly competitive. When Realtors ® talk about how they are finding the market to be highly undersupplied, my opinion is that the market itself is undersupplied, but not significantly so, but there is a definite undersupply of appropriately priced houses in good condition.

If you are curious about the market from the perspective of a 30-year market veteran, follow this blog or contact me directly. I have experience both from the sales side (from 1984-1989) and as a full-time appraiser since 1989. I am always happy to discuss your needs on the appraisal end and am open to discussion as to how to best present data that helps you.

All the best to all of my readers! Rachel Massey @ www.annarborappraisal.com

Washtenaw County snapshot

Days on market and current activity Washtenaw County, MI

Based on my experience, as days on the market for a property decreases, prices tend to increase. When days on market start to increase, prices tend to stabilize or decline.

One of the largest obstacles in measuring market direction is that closed sales are usually contracted for sale one-to-two months earlier than the closing. As such, the closed sales data lags even with the most recent data available. Including contracted sales would indicate a higher number of days on the market, but as many contracted sales do not close, the data below includes only closed sales, and absorption is addressed further in this discussion.

The chart above is a compilation of the different school districts in my local area, Washtenaw County. The data refers to days on market of sales, ran in an annualized manner. In other words, each data point is one years’ worth of sales but presented month-by-month. This helps eliminate the seasonality that we see as our market normally slows down after Labor Day and start to pick up in February.

What is noticeable at first glance is the convergence of days on market to a low point around June to July 2013 and a steady increase in days since August 2013. All districts are showing an increase in days on the market other than Manchester, and are mostly back to levels seen in late 2012/early 2013.

After examining the days on market, the next step is to look at how many sales occurred in the most recent period in each market (all of 2013 in this case) and then look at how many are on the market, not under contract, within the first two weeks of 2014. This information provides an estimated supply based on the most recent years’ worth of sales. The last column that chart is the contract-to-listing ratio (CLR) which simply looks at all offerings and compares the number under contract to the total number available and derives a percentage of absorption. From my perspective, a market that is active is normally hovering around 30% CLR and when it pushes upwards to 40% or over, is very active and a seller’s market. Conversely, when it is 20% or below it is much less active, and much less than 20% indicates a buyer’s market. Of course the ratios are all dependent on agents reporting contracts within the required period of their MLS so that it is not lagging by more than a couple of weeks.

At the same time that the number of days on the market declined in most areas, the number of sales increased. For example, Ann Arbor went from 805 arm’s length sales in 2011 to 939 in 2012 and 1,086 in 2013; yet in 2013 days on the market was virtually identical to 2011 (although it was lower in 2012). Ypsilanti went from 115 sales to 158 to 220, almost double the first year reported, yet days on the market dropped. In each market shown, the number of arm’s length sales rose in this period.

All data is gathered using the Ann Arbor Board of Realtors MLS. Sales data excludes distress sales and GLR MLS but does include Realcomp and therefore there is some duplication of listings throughout. This is not considered a significant sampling problem due to consistency in application throughout all market segments and current/contract offerings. Data run from 1/2/14 through 1/11/14.

Based on this information, my interpretation is that Ann Arbor looks like it is still very strong, and Lincoln appears to be in the throes of a seller’s market at the moment. Chelsea, Dexter and Saline are in the 20% range, meaning slow but a balanced market, and Manchester and Milan may have crossed into being a buyer’s market at this time based on these ratios.

Note, in each market run, the entire school district is examined, not submarkets. In an appraisal, the appraiser will look at the submarket, or “micro” market that relates to the subject property. If you are interested in knowing how your property adds up in today’s market, contact your local real estate expert for an analysis.

Enjoy – Rachel Massey www.annarborappraisal.com