Realtor Archives - annarborappraisal

What is a comparable sale?

A sales package left for the appraiser is welcome. Most appraisers appreciate the agent’s insights into the sales they used as comparable choices when they priced the home for sale. This is particularly the case if the agent had some knowledge of pet odors or peculiarities with one of the sales that looked like an obvious choice. Occasionally now, with photography, the sale presented itself in much better light than it actually was in reality. The MLS is after all, part sales tool. This is one reason you will get calls, emails and texts from appraisers asking about a property that you sold, as photos do not always tell the truth. So, please provide your insights related to the sales you considered in arriving at the marketing price.

There have been a few instances lately however, that made me think it is a good idea to revisit what a comparable sale is from an appraisal perspective. First, we do not search by price. While buyers do use a price range in their search, appraisers cannot do that, or they end up appraising to a predetermined value to a large extent. Instead, we are looking for comparable attributes.

Examples that have been included in agent packages recently include:

• Subject property was a subdivision house that was not a common model for that subdivision, but there was one sale of the same model. Package included two sales that were on 2-4 acres about 5 miles from the subdivision. There were at least five sales within the subdivision that were reasonably similar to the subject that had occurred within the past six months. The model match was not in the package and only the highest sales in the subdivision were included.
• Condominium unit that had ample model matches, but all the recent model matches were lower sales prices than the ones that occurred between 9-12 months prior. Guess which ones were in the package?

Most people will want to buy as much as they can for as little as possible. If you have a budget for a new car of $25,000, it is unlikely you would be looking at BMW’s or Mercedes, whereas if you have a budget of $60,000 and want a German car, you are unlikely to be looking at VW Bugs. Is the VW Bug comparable with a BMW 5-Series? Not likely. Are they both German Cars? Of course. Would the buyer of a Bug choose a 5-Series if they were the same price? Most likely. Would the buyer of the 5-Series buy the Bug if they were the same price? Highly unlikely. You get the picture.

This is the same idea with comparable properties. A comparable property is one that is a substitute for another property. It is uncommon to have properties that are directly comparable since every house has something unique about it.

What does this mean when you provide sales to an appraiser? First, look for what the typical buyer for your property would truly look at as a substitution. When you do that, look at those sales in the same vein. Would the buyer of that sale look at your property as a reasonable substitution? Sometimes there is nothing even approaching comparable to your property. In this instance, look to what else has sold that has some element of similarity, such as location, or quality and size, and then try to find something that is obviously not as good as your property as well as something that is better. In that manner, at least you will know that the property should be worth more than one house and less than another. Appraisers will do this on those unique circumstances when there is truly no comparable property to choose from. The appraiser will look to what they think are logical potential alternatives, even if they appear dissimilar.

Remember, the appraiser is going to choose the sales they consider most comparable, but the package you provide can be extremely useful, and you may have information about possible comparable properties that does not show on the MLS. Expect the appraiser will independently verify that information, but give them something to start with. Our MLS lacks a scratch and sniff function, and there is some virtual staging that occurs at times in listings, so give us the information you have that is relevant.

Monthly market snapshot

Mixing up the way I do the monthly report a bit. In addition to the normal information about the absorption rates and where activity is as of a certain date, I have also included a two-year summary of price changes in each area. Hope that you all find this interesting, and as always, if you have questions, reach out to me, either via phone or email.

Without further ado, the monthly inventory in each market is showing from as low as 1.13 months, to as high as 3.56 months depending on the area. The area with the most inventory however, is actually showing as such due to the abundance of new construction exposed as “to be built”. This means the properties are not immediately available. Since I have run this data in the same manner consistently, I am carrying on with including all market exposed properties through the MLS, but Saline is not as saturated as it appears at first blush.

The market overall is undersupplied, with most areas around two months or less. Since this data includes every listing and sale within each school district, for submarket data, it does not apply. It is useful in measuring where activity is, but as always, you have to look at the market segment in which a property operates.

Based on the contract to listing ratios (CTLR on grid), the greatest activity is in Lincoln school district, followed by Ypsilanti and then Ann Arbor. The areas that are showing as leaning towards a buyers’ market are Manchester and Dexter. Saline is tilting towards a balanced market. Chelsea, Whitmore Lake, Lincoln, Milan, Ypsilanti and Ann Arbor are in seller’s market territory again.

It looks like spring may have sprung.

What about changes in price over time? Again, this is larger market data, not specific to any particular submarket section. These are arrayed by school district, and each data point is one-years’ worth of data at a time, moving forward in a monthly manner. This eliminates seasonality and is useful in seeing more nuanced changes. Looking at this information, it is easy to see that Dexter increased, but there is a decline over the past couple of months. Stability in pricing is seen in Chelsea, Saline, Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti based on the trend lines over the last four or so months. Prices have increased across the board in the past two years but also have slowed or even declined in places. Still, in comparison with two years ago, we are increased on the macro market segments.

If I take this information and put it on an easy to read grid and it is easy to see that over a two-year period, most of the markets are in the double-digits in increases, however the past year was not so kind to Manchester, Dexter, Saline and to an extent, Ann Arbor. The increases in these areas were smaller, and in some cases, negative. The largest increases in the past year were found in Milan, Ypsilanti and Whitmore Lake. This makes sense when observing the median prices, which are lower in those areas, with the outlier being Manchester. My take on this is that as some markets have become expensive for the average buyer, they have moved into different, lower priced markets, which are putting pressure on increases in those areas.

I am continuing to observe our market on every appraisal I develop and communicate. Markets can change quite rapidly, and each market will have a number of submarkets within it. All of this information is presented in a broad manner for ease of reading. All information is culled from the Ann Arbor Area Board of Realtors MLS and is assumed accurate.

Market snapshot – Ann Arbor/Saline

Market snapshot – comparing Ann Arbor and Saline

Prologue

I admit it; I am a data junkie. There is something about graphs and charts that I just get all-geeked out about. Maybe it is simply having too much time on my hands, or maybe it is a thirst for knowledge (hoping for the latter, but with understanding it may be the former).

Without further ado, I offer my recent take on the comparison of two markets, because they often compete with each other.

The data below is run as one years’ worth of data at a time, but compared month over month (so if you see a comparison from June 2012 to June 2013 each of those sets has an entire years’ worth of data leading up to the date. In this first graph, I have compared the cumulative days on the market of sales in Ann Arbor school district, as exposed through the Ann Arbor Area Board of Realtors MLS, compared to the same in Saline. I took all sales and looked at the median. In both segments, days on market declined to a low point in May/June 2013, and have since risen and then stabilized. Saline had longer median days on market but shows as stable compared to Ann Arbor, which is slightly increased over the past couple of months.

What about price? On the median price, Saline is ahead of Ann Arbor. On median price per square foot, Ann Arbor is ahead of Saline. Why is this? It is related to median size. The median size of a house in the Saline market is greater than the median size of a house in the Ann Arbor market. As price per square foot is normally higher as size declines, it makes sense that you would see that.

If you compare month to month, for the past five months, the closed sales in the Ann Arbor market show as flat (although that is changing now) whereas Saline has been rising. If you skip down to the price per square foot, the rising prices in Saline are at a slower rate than just by the median price.

Inventory levels as of 4/8/14: Ann Arbor had 152 active offerings in total, compared to 1,176 sales the year before, or 1.55-months’ worth of inventory (not much). Saline had 50 offerings compared to 297 sales in the year prior, or 2.02 months’ worth of supply. In both instances, supply was quite limited, and this limited supply does appear to be driving many multiple offer situations. In both markets, the contract-to-listing ratio shows as favoring seller’s, with Ann Arbor at 40.16% and Saline at 41.18% as of the 4/8/14 run date.

When the contract-to-listing ratio and low inventory favor sellers, prices typically increase. When they favor buyers, prices typically decrease. Markets are very fluid and changeable, and what is apparent a week ago, may well change dramatically a month from now. The market is sensitive to interest rates, employment rates, income changes, and national news, among other issues.

Epilogue

Appraisals are “opinions” of value by educated professionals. They are opinions based on factual data, but in the end of the opinion of a professional. Not all appraisers have equal qualifications and experience, and therefore not all opinions are equal. If you are shopping for an appraiser to help provide you an independent opinion of value, base your selection on the breadth and depth of that appraiser’s knowledge and experience, not the price of the appraisal assignment. After all, it is typically your largest investment, and does it make sense to be penny-wise and pound-foolish?

Rachel Massey, www.annarborappraisal.com

Latest comparison to online valuation models

Latest comparison to online valuation models

It is quite frustrating to see how many people rely on these online value estimators to either price their home, or use it for marital dissolution, or other reasons. As will be shown in a minute, these can be off by a significant amount, either low or high.

I just ran sales in Ann Arbor, in the 48103 area for the past couple of weeks. I then compared the sales prices to two online value estimators and State Equalized Value times two. The only consistency to the information is that these online value estimators overestimated on houses in need of work and underestimated on those houses that were remodeled. In only a small percentage of cases, were the value tools within five percent of the actual sales price.

If you are shopping for an appraiser to help provide you an independent opinion of value, base your selection on the breadth and depth of that appraiser’s knowledge and experience, not the price of the appraisal assignment. After all, it is typically your client’s largest investment, and does it make sense to be penny-wise and pound-foolish?

Rachel Massey, www.annarborappraisal.com