Tag: Rachel Massey

Westridge of Dexter

 

Westridge in Dexter

 

Pass under the historic Dexter Railroad Bridge heading west, and on your right, along the curve towards Pinckney, is Westridge subdivision.  Like many developments that took place during the housing boom of the late 1990’s and early 2000’s, this development was a roaring success until the local real estate market started to hit the brakes in 2005.  Most houses in the development were built between 2000 and 2006, although there were a handful in 1999 and 2007.  The remaining lots started to be sold off to individual builders and new construction began again in 2010. The development splits between these older and newer houses, with the newer houses primarily situated on the northern side of the neighborhood, although there are scattered newer houses throughout. Only a couple vacant sites remain at this writing.

 

Houses are tract built, but with variety. There is ranch style, colonial, and some transitional houses with first-floor owner’s suites. Many have walkout basements and back to wetlands or wooded areas. Some back to walkways or parks. There are smaller houses, just north of 1,300 sqft, as well as some larger houses closer to 3,000 sqft. The newer houses tend to be higher priced and with modern upgrades as expected.

 

Westridge has a fortunate location adjacent to the Huron River and attendant park systems. It is along the Border to Border trail, offering easy access to both recreation and to the city center through a well-maintained pathway. This is particularly attractive in that there are no walkways along Island Lake Road, near the Railroad Bridge, making pedestrian traffic potentially life-threatening otherwise. The pathway that connects the subdivision to the downtown core requires only a few blocks walk, and many buyers consider this a particular selling point for this development.

 

 

Newer subdivisions appear to have been hit fairly hard during the Great Recession, at least locally. Westridge was no exception. The Ann Arbor Area Board of Realtors, from where my research is gleaned, maintains listings back in time, but only in a robust manner to 2006.  In a map search (above) of the development, I found sales back to 2001, but only a limited number. The data that follows is a scatter graph of all sales at their adjusted sales price, over time. Following that, is a yearly chart showing differences in sales prices per year, and at the end is information about current activity.

 

 

As is seen in this scatter graph, the market declined to a low point between 2008 and 2009, and current prices are well above the prices seen in 2001-2006 before the decline.

 

Laying this out in a yearly manner makes this information a bit more readable. The data below shows only median adjusted sales prices and price per sqft for simplicity purposes. Caveat on the data is that between 2001 and 2003 there were only minimal sales retained, and the number of sales started to increase in the MLS in 2004. Nevertheless, this information shows how the market declined over time and how it has recovered and exceeded previous prices. In the median adjusted prices, there is a blip upwards in price in 2005 followed by a decline to 2009. The 2010 price jump relates to size, therefore the next chart that follows shows price per square foot.

 

 

Looking at price per square foot the data shows the peak in 2003, declining steadily from 2004 through 2009. In my experience as a local appraiser, this appears more reasonable. I recall, in mid-2006 telling my husband the market had dropped around 10% and I didn’t see it going much lower. Oops.

 

 

The median Sales price since 12/5/17 (one year to the date of this writing) was $400,000 and the median asking price $420,000 on a 2,145 sqft house. There are currently two offerings in the development not under contract. The median asking price is $372,450 and a median 2,047 sqft house. Asking price is lower than the previous asking price of the sold properties by 11.32% and median size difference is 4.57%. Therefore, this information shows that prices may be down, as the asking prices are lower still than the difference in size. There are two properties under contract, and their median asking price is $369,900 and size 1,967 sqft. That means the asking price is 11.93% lower and the size is 8.3% lower, still indicating there is a decline potential.

 

Until we have a bit more data it is hard to call, but as an appraiser this information is meaningful, and I would not be calling the market increasing in spite the recent price increases noted in the charts above.  For those of you actively participating in this market, please pay attention to “chatter” from buyers, sellers, agents and appraisers. Who knows exactly what will happen going forward, but there are indications that the market is changing.

 

 

Why the contract?

Why does the appraiser need the sales contract?

 

This is a question we hear over and over again.  It seems counter-intuitive, that if an appraiser is hired to come to an independent opinion of market value in a sales situation, that they would require a copy of the contract.  There are a couple reasons that the appraiser will request the contract.

 

One is that it is a requirement of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) to which appraisers must comply. Specifically, the appraiser needs to comply with Standards Rule 1-5 (a), which is:

 

When the value opinion to be developed is market value, an appraiser must, if such information is available to the appraiser in the normal course of business: analyze all agreements of sale, options, and listings of the subject property current as of the effective date of the appraisal; and (b) analyze all sales of the subject property that occurred within three (3) years prior to the effective date of the appraisal.

 

This is the development standard, meaning when the appraiser is doing the analysis portion of the assignment.  The reporting standard, the meat of what the public sees, applies to Standards Rule 2-2(a)(viii). In it, the comment section, third paragraph is:

 

When reporting an opinion of market value, a summary of the results of analyzing the subject sales, agreements of sale, options, and listings in accordance with Standards Rule 1-5 is required. If such information is unobtainable, a statement on the efforts undertaken by the appraiser to obtain the information is required. If such information is irrelevant, a statement acknowledging the existing of the information and citing its lack of relevance is required.

 

As noted above, analyzing and reporting on the contract is a requirement of USPAP. This is the primary reason you will be asked for a copy of the sales contract.

 

Another reason that you will be asked for a copy of the contract is to analyze what the meeting of the minds was, as the negotiation process can be meaningful. If the house was listed for $250,000 and there were five offers from $250,000 to $260,000 and it sold for $260,000, then the seller was in a very strong position and it is evidence of a seller’s market. If it was listed for $250,000 and sat on the market for six months, before getting an accepted offer at $200,000, then the buyer was in the best position. What if this house sold for $240,000 and the appraisers’ sales were from $220,000 to $245,000, and the value indication was $238,000?  What if the adjusted range of the sales was from $235,000 to $240,000, but the most similar of the sales was $240,000 and adjusted at the same?  Even if the indication from other sales was $238,000, that $240,000 was also supported, and it was the most relevant sale. If the appraiser opted for that $238,000 value instead of considering the negotiated contract between willing buyer and willing seller, they may be remiss. It is one data point in a series of other data points, and should be considered. Now of course, if the best indicator was $235,000 and there was only one odd sale supporting $240,000, we would expect the opinion to be at $235,000. There is normally some swing in range, in which one sale will stand out as better than the others. This is one of the reasons that the appraiser asks for a copy of the contract. It is also one reason that appraisers do not average adjusted sales prices, as there is often one or two sales that are more similar to the subject property than the others.

 

If the lender underwriters could make a decision based on the adjusted and unadjusted range of values, it would make this contract analysis less important. Unfortunately, a range of values has not been accepted by the government sponsored entities as a viable position, in spite of it being most relevant from the appraisal standpoint. As long as a point value  is required in the reporting of the value opinion (and required by USPAP), appraisers will need to keep analyzing the contract.  It bears repeating however, that an appraisal should never be a “bulls-eye” and if the value falls lower than the sales price, then it is quite simply possible that the property sold over market value. This happens in particular in highly undersupplied markets, or with buyers who are unduly motivated or lack knowledge of the market.  The appraiser’s role as the unbiased third party is critical at that juncture. Reading the tone of the market and completing a true market analysis is vital, as markets are fluid.

 

Regardless of whether the appraiser is able to obtain a copy of the contract, they still need to address what steps they took to obtain it, and they need to analyze the listings of the property. Although USPAP addresses listings current as of the effective date of the report, the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac forms go further with the specific question “is the subject property currently offered for sale or has it been offered for sale in the twelve months prior to the effective date of this appraisal?”  That means that even if it is not offered for sale today, but was offered for sale six months ago at $200,000 and is now under contract for $250,000, there is going to be a need to discuss what happened in the interim. Did the market change drastically in those six months, such as the city being awarded the second Amazon Headquarters?  Did the house undergo substantial renovation? Was it taken off the market six months ago in order to mitigate the problem points with buyers, such as installing a new roof and a new kitchen after complaints indicated those were huge sticking points?  The appraiser is going to have to address it regardless, if the report is for mortgage financing.

 

Even though it may seem strange that the appraiser is requesting a copy of the contract, or even asking about prior listings, it is part of our due diligence process. It is a requirement of our professional standards.  Please be forthcoming with all information that has been negotiated, including any sales concessions or repairs that may be on a separate addendum. Afterall, it is part of what is required of the appraiser in their analysis of the sale.